I'm with you Mike and Rich. I was born in 1953 and I loved the Saturday matinee 
theaters on t.v. from as far back as I can remember. I mean Saturday morning 
was Sky King, Roy and Dale,  and cartoons, but the afternoon was either Abbott 
and Costello, Tarzan theater or horror movies. I remember seeing the Mummy for 
the first time and it scared the bejeebees out of me. I have many posters in my 
own collection that are for films I have never even seen, mostly from the 
silent period, but the posters are beautiful. In contrast, some of my favorite 
films have horrible looking posters. My favorite posters are rarely of my 
favorite films. I still have a connection, though, to posters that represent 
movies that I watched, mostly on t.v. for the first time. Some I have seen at 
old movie houses when I got older. It's always a thrill to see a favorite movie 
on the big screen that I have only seen on t.v. as a kid, but it's the movie, 
not the size of the screen that holds the real thrill for me.

 

Sue

www.hollywoodposterframes.com 
 


Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:02:48 -0700
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Expanding hobby?
To: [email protected]





I agree with Rich as far as not being old enough to have bought posters from 
films I was old enough top see in the theaters. Well, for the most part. 
 
Even though I was born in 1950, the horror and sci-fi of the 30's and 40's have 
a tremendously nostalgic pull due to television. As a child I would watch those 
Realart re-releases of the Universal horror films. Also in Boston area around 
the 60's and/or early 70's  there was, as I remember it, Mystery Theater on 
WSBK TV 38 where I was exposed to the Rathbone/Bruce Sherlock Holmes films, 
Charlie Chan and Mister Moto. Talk about a must see. This tv viewing is what 
led me to my collecting old horror and sci-fi. 
 
The 50's films also were nostlgic in the same way, only having seen a few in 
the theater (IT CONQUERED THE WORLD and THE SHE-CREATURE my most vivid 
memories. But even most of the 50's fare I got from Creature Feature/Doub le 
Feature and Fantasmic Features (hosted in Boston by "Feep" - anyone remember 
goold old Feep?)
 
Funny thing is that I am left cold by many if not most 60's and 70's films 
(yes, there are definite exceptions but overall I am just itchily bored with 
them). 
 
So television was my nostalgia and a danged powerful influence it was.. 
 
Pov
 
May the holes in your collection be filled.



From: Richard Evans <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 1:34:44 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Expanding hobby?



 "If you didn't see the movie when it first came out, and remember seeing the 
poster for it hanging in the theater lobby, then you might still appreciate the 
poster, but you are not going to have that gut-level strong nostalgic pull to 
fork over big bucks for it."


I honestly can't think of a single poster I've bought that I was old enough to 
see at the cinema, and mostly I didn't even exist when the film was released.
Isn't that the same for most of us?
People passionately collecting 50's Sci-Fi aren't in their seventies, Todd and 
Jim Gresham aren't in their nineties, or Ken Schacter pushing a century.


I flicked through Hollywood Posters 1 from 1990 the other night.
Huge percentage of 20's and 30's material, extremely small amount of anything 
later, and it only got as recent as a Forbidden Planet 1 sht.
I think it's much the same through to Hollywood Posters 6.


I can imagine the hoots of derision when at some point not too much later 
someone had the crazy idea of suggesting 60s and even 70s posters could be sold 
at auction.


Looking at those posters from the 20s, they are beautiful, but look irrelevant.
Everything moves on, and I can't imagine there being the connection to the film 
or the style of artwork.


It's the same with antiques/furniture. Edwardian and Victorian out, continued 
popularity of modern design, Mid Century, or earlier or later.


Although what initially hooked me, the screening of the classics on TV in my 
youth isn't there to the same degree to hook young people, won't people who 
love film still exist and seek out and appreciate earlier movies ? (They may 
even learn to master subtitles and B&W.)
And, aren't they likely to still find appeal in the art of whatever genres that 
will go in and out of fashion.


Though yes, I wouldn't necessarily expect much from anyone, (in disposable cash 
or taste) until they reach their thirties.














On 20 Jul 2010, at 21:50, James Richard wrote:

Peter,

I would tend to agree with your feeling that poster collecting is not 
expanding, logic seems to indicate it, but on the other hand you see some stuff 
that can't be otherwise explained. An example would be original posters for the 
Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings films. The prices for those posters, while 
not ultra-high, have remained firm, even though the first of those posters came 
out 10 years ago. Surely it is younger people buying/collecting those and 
similar items and keeping the prices up? I think the real question -- one that 
cannot yet be answered -- is how many of those younger buyers will *remain* 
movie poster collectors and, perhaps as they grow older, become interesting 
some of the great older posters? After all, great poster art is great poster 
art, regardless of when the film came out.

But there is no denying that simple nostalgia is the *big* driver in all forms 
of memorabilia collecting. If you didn't see the movie when it first came out, 
and remember seeing the poster for it hanging in the theater lobby, then you 
might still appreciate the poster, but you are not going to have that gut-level 
strong nostalgic pull to fork over big bucks for it.

-- JR

peter contarino wrote: 


I think all of Ron’s questions are excellent and on point. I also think that 
the answer is “all the above”. The economy is awful, supply outweighs demand, 
the high-rollers have acquired many of their pieces and the younger 
generation(s)would rather text and tweet than watch a film(literally- I was at 
a theater recently and the kid a few seats in front of me texted for the better 
part of the film). And after all, like who, you know, would want to, like, 
watch a black and white film anyway…and stuff…dude.
 
I don’t know whether the hobby is expanding; you guys would know more about 
that. My sense is that it is not. I can’t imagine it is bringing a lot of 
younger people in. I think the target is 35+ years of age. Maybe older. For 
example, my wife and I were spending the weekend with some friends of ours who 
just built a getaway home. They will be retiring in 10 years or so. We got to 
talking about the website Ken and I have and then the questions started coming: 
What does the poster to “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” look like? Do you have it? And 
so on. Bottom line is that they want to do at least one room and maybe more 
with vintage paper from films that they love. These are professionals with 
money and grew up on classic films who never knew that this paper existed.  I 
have some ideas about how to tap into that demographic.
 
Regarding the images that Heritage provides, I have to say that they are spot 
on. I spoke with Ken Schacter about this yesterday and we both feel that the 
photo/scans are by far the most accurate and highest quality of any site, 
auction or not. The catalogs are unparalleled and are collectable in 
themselves. Great reference material.
 
It’s an uncertain market to be sure but as Bruce and Grey have pointed out it 
is a great time to buy.
 
 
Peter


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

                                          
         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to