My daughter is 25 years old, works for a publisher of graphic novels and helps 
run an art gallery. We talk about classic films all the time. The last time we 
chatted she told me how much she enjoyed watching Bus Stop. She's not put off 
if a movie is 50 years old and/or shot in black and white. She also enjoys 70s 
grindhouse fare as do many of her friends. Just a couple of weeks ago a small 
cinema opened in Montreal specializing in vintage exploitation, grindhouse and 
arthouse films.

I know she's not your typical 20-something but the way some of you generalize 
about her generation you'd think they were all know-nothings who are only 
waiting for the next Iron Man movie to come out.

I have the feeling many of you are unaware that there is a significant number 
of young people who are knowledgeable and, yes, DO care about the history of 
popular culture. Modern information technology has made older films more 
accessible than ever.

Furthermore, in Montreal we are currently in the middle of a festival, 
Fantasia, that specializes in showing a wide variety of genre films. The fest, 
which is internationally renowned, attracts thousands of people to soldout 
shows and grows by leaps and bounds every year, just honored Ken Russell and 
will be ending next week with a showing of the recently restored version of 
Metropolis with music accompaniment by a full symphony orchestra.

Maybe it's because I'm somewhat tied in to the arts scene in Montreal (which I 
have to believe is somewhat similar to arts scenes in other major North 
American cities), but I know a LOT of young people who care about this stuff. 
Maybe in mainstream America that's not the case but on the other hand, 
mainstream America thinks Justin Bieber (a Canadian, I'm embarrassed to say) is 
a great talent.

I think your doom and gloom is misplaced because most of you, from what I have 
gleaned, are not aware of these young people, some of whom will be the 
collectors of the future (or are already, since many of my clients are starting 
to skew to this younger demographic).

Sure, some stuff will fall by the wayside partly due to demographics and 
changing tastes. But there are a lot of people who will continue to discover 
this wonderful hobby as they come to realize these gorgeous scraps of paper 
that we already love are available to them, too.

Dave
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Halegua Comic Art 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] Expanding hobby?


  While Richard is correct that most of us could not have seen Thief of Bagdad 
with Fairbanks in 1924, it is also correct that I saw this film at the tender 
age of 11 years old on PBS in NYC as I did silents like Caligari, Metropolis, 
Siegfried, Phantom of the Opera and many more.

  Unihorror was regularly shown on TV as were 100s or 1000s of classic movies 
as well. So while we didn't see these movies in 1931 or 1941, we did in 1961, 
71 and beyond. The difference today is this: young folks (under 35) aren't 
interested in watching b&w movies, and movies "without words" as I hear many 
young'uns call silents are as far from their viewing schedule as I am from the 
Ukraine. As such, these types of films are not a part of their public 
consciousness as they are of ours.

  However my good pal Peter is also partially incorrect in his post. It isn't 
that the hobby is imploding entirely - it's that the vintage part of the hobby 
is. These younger collectors who come in to the hobby want Star Wars, or Toy 
Story, or Pulp Fiction because they do go to contemporary films. They just 
aren't interested in "classics", and that doesn't just extend to old b&w 
movies. Most of them will never watch Ben Hur, or GWTW, and while they do all 
watch vintage cartoons (cartoons have a more timeless quality) I doubt many of 
these children understand they were made in the 30s & 40s. Unlike our 
generations, most of them don't know King Kong was first filmed in 1933, or 
that the Psycho that they know is not the Psycho that we know

  But it isn't limited to movie posters. Comics books, baseball cards, post 
cards and many other fields are experiencing the same loss of culture for all 
of the same reasons above. Boiled down to it's simplest terms, they aren't 
interested in history.. unless it's the history of Yoda or the Twilight Saga

  Rich


  At 01:34 PM 7/21/2010, Richard Evans wrote:

     "If you didn't see the movie when it first came out, and remember seeing 
the poster for it hanging in the theater lobby, then you might still appreciate 
the poster, but you are not going to have that gut-level strong nostalgic pull 
to fork over big bucks for it."

    I honestly can't think of a single poster I've bought that I was old enough 
to see at the cinema, and mostly I didn't even exist when the film was released.
    Isn't that the same for most of us?
    People passionately collecting 50's Sci-Fi aren't in their seventies, Todd 
and Jim Gresham aren't in their nineties, or Ken Schacter pushing a century.

    I flicked through Hollywood Posters 1 from 1990 the other night.
    Huge percentage of 20's and 30's material, extremely small amount of 
anything later, and it only got as recent as a Forbidden Planet 1 sht.
    I think it's much the same through to Hollywood Posters 6.

    I can imagine the hoots of derision when at some point not too much later 
someone had the crazy idea of suggesting 60s and even 70s posters could be sold 
at auction.

    Looking at those posters from the 20s, they are beautiful, but look 
irrelevant.
    Everything moves on, and I can't imagine there being the connection to the 
film or the style of artwork.

    It's the same with antiques/furniture. Edwardian and Victorian out, 
continued popularity of modern design, Mid Century, or earlier or later.

    Although what initially hooked me, the screening of the classics on TV in 
my youth isn't there to the same degree to hook young people, won't people who 
love film still exist and seek out and appreciate earlier movies ? (They may 
even learn to master subtitles and B&W.)
    And, aren't they likely to still find appeal in the art of whatever genres 
that will go in and out of fashion.

    Though yes, I wouldn't necessarily expect much from anyone, (in disposable 
cash or taste) until they reach their thirties.







    On 20 Jul 2010, at 21:50, James Richard wrote:


      Peter,

      I would tend to agree with your feeling that poster collecting is not 
expanding, logic seems to indicate it, but on the other hand you see some stuff 
that can't be otherwise explained. An example would be original posters for the 
Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings films. The prices for those posters, while 
not ultra-high, have remained firm, even though the first of those posters came 
out 10 years ago. Surely it is younger people buying/collecting those and 
similar items and keeping the prices up? I think the real question -- one that 
cannot yet be answered -- is how many of those younger buyers will *remain* 
movie poster collectors and, perhaps as they grow older, become interesting 
some of the great older posters? After all, great poster art is great poster 
art, regardless of when the film came out.

      But there is no denying that simple nostalgia is the *big* driver in all 
forms of memorabilia collecting. If you didn't see the movie when it first came 
out, and remember seeing the poster for it hanging in the theater lobby, then 
you might still appreciate the poster, but you are not going to have that 
gut-level strong nostalgic pull to fork over big bucks for it.

      -- JR

      peter contarino wrote:

        I think all of Ron's questions are excellent and on point. I also think 
that the answer is "all the above". The economy is awful, supply outweighs 
demand, the high-rollers have acquired many of their pieces and the younger 
generation(s)would rather text and tweet than watch a film(literally- I was at 
a theater recently and the kid a few seats in front of me texted for the better 
part of the film). And after all, like who, you know, would want to, like, 
watch a black and white film anyway.and stuff.dude.
         
        I don't know whether the hobby is expanding; you guys would know more 
about that. My sense is that it is not. I can't imagine it is bringing a lot of 
younger people in. I think the target is 35+ years of age. Maybe older. For 
example, my wife and I were spending the weekend with some friends of ours who 
just built a getaway home. They will be retiring in 10 years or so. We got to 
talking about the website Ken and I have and then the questions started coming: 
What does the poster to "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" look like? Do you have it? And 
so on. Bottom line is that they want to do at least one room and maybe more 
with vintage paper from films that they love. These are professionals with 
money and grew up on classic films who never knew that this paper existed.  I 
have some ideas about how to tap into that demographic.
         
        Regarding the images that Heritage provides, I have to say that they 
are spot on. I spoke with Ken Schacter about this yesterday and we both feel 
that the photo/scans are by far the most accurate and highest quality of any 
site, auction or not. The catalogs are unparalleled and are collectable in 
themselves. Great reference material.
         
        It's an uncertain market to be sure but as Bruce and Grey have pointed 
out it is a great time to buy.
         
         
        Peter


      Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
      ___________________________________________________________________
      How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
      Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
      In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
      The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    ___________________________________________________________________
    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
    Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to