dmb replies: That simply doesn't make sense. How can "sensibility" be counted as something other than an experience?
Hi DMB What an odd blind spot you have about how language works. Ham is entitled to make a distinction any way he likes. A good dose of Rorty would help you here. Ham says he calls what we sense prior to conceptualisation a sensation and what we conceptualise experience-proper. I assume he has his reasons for doing this. You and I may decide it does not work for us, it has no use, we can make better sense of our sensations and experiences with different language but it is easy to understand the distinction, it might have its uses. It is up to Ham to show what that use is. If we are gonna walk the MOQ walk we need to use lines of argument and justification that don't contradict our MOQ take on language. That's my view. You damage debate with these lapses. David M Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
