> In defining the concept of "pure experience" as postulated by two > philosophers, Krueger says: > > "For both James and Nishida, the self simply is the continual modulation > between the expansive self-transcendence of > consciousness-as-selective-interest, and the contraction of the self > experienced as a corporeal body-a material entity over against other > material entities. James says that "our full self is the whole field [of > experience], with all those indefinitely radiating subconscious > possibilities of increase that we can only feel without conceiving...." > -- Quoted from > http://williamjamesstudies.press.uiuc.edu/1.1/krueger.html >
DM: Yes experience is not of just bodies, matter, objects, it is full of radiating possibilities, such is the experience of bodies, matter, objects, they are not entities, givens, properties, they are possibilities, complexies of possibilities, potential relationships,actions, events, interactions, potential change. Does no one see the obvious connection between human experience free of SOM and what quantum theory tells us 'things' are via scientific description? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
