Hi Ian

No argument.

DM

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ian glendinning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Forget about Empiricism, no thanks.


> Hi David,
>
> Yes Maxwell is challenging "basic empiricism" but he is not throwing
> baby out with the bathwater .... his "Aim-Oriented-Empiricism /
> AO-Rationality" are "extending" basic empiricism adding evolutionary
> levels of value (which he calls Wisdom, we call Quality, ie aims are
> about values.)
>
> The Roy Bhaskar stuff looks interesting ... I'll have to digest and come 
> back.
> Ian
>
> On 10/20/07, David M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Ian & all
>>
>> Actually I think Nick Maxwell would say that he
>> is challenging standard empiricism, the pure kind
>> suggested by James and taken up by Dewey is
>> also non-standard and has much in common
>> with Maxwell's aim orientated empiricism.
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to