[Krimel]
dmb's comments below illustrate the point very nicely. What level does
family fit into? In some ways your claim that it is social, works. But one
could forcefully argue that the "family" is purely biological. The various
forms that "family" takes in human communities is well with in the range of
variation we see spread before us in the animal kingdom. We see species that
are polygamous, monogamous and indiscriminant. We see species that raise
their young well into adulthood and others that toss them from the nest or
the den before they are dry behind the ears.

The question would be: what manner of line drawing and connecting of dots do
the "levels" provide that enrich our understanding of families? If one
examines the phenomenon of family in terms of patterns of interaction that
are relatively static and patterns that are in relative flux I see lots of
advantages. Our offspring are more likely to grow into healthy adults if
most of the patterns of interaction around them are static. There needs to
be a constant food supply, familiar faces, predictable patterns of coming
and going. 

There is nothing wrong with looking at a system of levels. They are a useful
heuristic but they are rules of thumb not metaphysical laws. They are
metaphorical and in this case one might add merely metaphorical.


Krimel said to Ron:
So where does "family" fit into a system of levels? Is it biologically
determined, Socially mediated and Intellectually justified? What sense do
these questions make? What does this add to our understanding of "family"?

dmb butts in:
We can subject the institution to intellectual analysis but I think "the
family" itself is a social structure that evolved out of the organic
arrangement such as is seen in so many other animals. In civilized human
life, the family has become the primary transmitter of culture, the middle
managers of society, the main agents of language acquisition, etc.. Is there
a culture on earth that doesn't put a premium on family values? I seriously
doubt it. One is a function of the other and vice versa. 

Its not much of a trick to see how the family would fit into the MOQ's
levels, but I think this hierarchy has a much broader aim. By construing the
levels as the products of a qualitative shift in the direction of
evolutuion, they give a certain shape to the conflicts in our history and in
ourselves. To put it crudely, they help explain war, fascism, sin and
selling out. By drawing just a few simple lines, the levels add huge
explanatory power to all sorts of things and generally orient us a moral
universe. All the details are debatable and there is no claim about the
levels being thee absolute truth or whatever. They're just a way of cutting
up the known facts about ourselves as composite, evolutionary beings in a
particular historical place. That's one of the reasons its so hard to
respond to criticisms that I'd characterize as petty sniping. I mean, the
levels aren't supposed to provide us with definitions or assign rank to all
the items we could ask about. Questions about the nature of the family, for
example, are going to be answered by those who've studied it. I mean, the
facts about anything and everything can be placed into the MOQ's hierarchy
only to the extent that we bring them to it. My own ignorance of the topic
is vast and maybe I'd move it if I knew more about the family, but I don't
think that's a basis for criticism of the levels.






_________________________________________________________________
Put your friends on the big screen with Windows VistaR + Windows LiveT.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_
MediaCtr_bigscreen_102007
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to