On Sunday 25 November 8:08 AM Bo writes to Ian & all [snip] One more: The static levels are blind to the level context (not to quality though) the Q context is only seen from MOQ's meta-level. The 4th. level by itself is SOM and its "intellect" is the subject - the mind - that peers out at the objective world. If this is made into MOQ's 4th. level, it all turns haywire something that has truly happened. Hi Bo, Ian and all,
³The static levels are blind to the level context² I was taught: ³Nemo dat quod non habet². You can¹t give what you don¹t have! Even the inorganic level has an affinity to the organic level. IMO you have to be able to explain an MOQ meta-level. I suggest that a conscious evolution parallel to a cosmic evolution is required. Gaia Man Woman Proprietary awarenessconsciousnessemptiness etc. Intellect-Law---two seen in relationship---law---cosmic & conscious MOQ meta-level----next step of conscious evolution only (Thanks Bo!) Enlightenment----last step of conscious evolution IMO Luminous intelligence¹ is not blind to the level context. A code of art is possible and necessary in all endeavors of conscious experience even at the inorganic level (value). Joe > One more: The static levels are blind to the level context (not to > quality though) the Q context is only seen from MOQ's meta- > level. The 4th. level by itself is SOM and its "intellect" is the > subject - the mind - that peers out at the objective world. If this is > made into MOQ's 4th. level, it all turns haywire something that > has truly happened. > > Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
