Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> When your premises in addition (to misunderstaning the 4th. level) is
> that the static hierarchy is "dogmatic and meaningless" no wonder. But
> listen: The idea of God is also the idea of Zews or any other deity - as
> is that of the moon and stars as deities - and in a MOQ context this is
> social value (for a value it is) but compared to it intellect is a higher
> value and deems the idea of god(s) to be superstition. This it does
> because intellect is a blind to being a value level (as the rest of the
> levels are) only from the MOQ the value context is seen.
Good point about seeing the world in the MOQ "context" instead of through the
usual subject/object lens. "Intellect is blind to being a value level" sums up
the
problem beautifully. Maybe some here who might better relate to the idea that
the
MOQ is a whole new "paradigm" instead of just another view resting on
conventional
assumptions. "Paradigm" appeals to fans of Thomas Kuhn's philosophy.
Best regards,
Platt
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
