HI Bo, All, I asked: >> Can others provide evidence of what Pirsig means by subject-object >> metaphysics?
Bo answered: >We all hopefully agree that ZAMM's "Greek section" describes >the emergence, development and coming of age of SOM. >(my caps) > > Anaxagoras and Parmenides had a listener named > Socrates who carried their ideas into full fruition. What is > essential to understand at this point is that until now there > was no such thing as MIND and MATTER, SUBJECT and > OBJECT, FORM and SUBSTANCE. Those divisions are > just dialectical inventions that came later. Steve: Thanks for providing a Pirsig quote. Others have provided their views of SOM. I am especially interested in determining what Pirisg himself means by subject-object metatphysics. I don't think he uses that term until Lila. I will try to dig out some qoutes when I have time. I'd appreciate it if others could try to do the same. Regards, Steve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
