Marsha,
I was merely offering that approach as I understand it to be.
But I am aware that it is my understanding. May your 
exploration prove Fruitful to your own understanding.

With warm regards,
-ron

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MarshaV
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MD] Taoism

At 10:31 AM 1/3/2008, you wrote:




>Interesting how you state then " I am not talking about mere sexual
>discrimination.  It's not as personal as you seem to think."
>
>Then immediately follow with " Gender is a division more INSIDIOUS than
>subject/object"
>
>Do you not see the contradiction?

Ron,

That gender is a division more INSIDIOUS than subject/object is 
something I think worth exploring.  I see no contradiction.  Maybe 
insidious because it reflects a biological difference that has warped 
into some pretty hideous social and intellectual patterns.  Surely 
you notice the difference between a tiger and an elephant.  I'm 
addressing static patterns.  I suggest that the world's wisdom is 
lopsided, and wonder if there isn't a way to consider a more balanced 
approach.

Marsha



Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...  

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to