Moqtalk. On 19 Jan. Spiritual praised Akshay who had written.
> Pirsig's metaphysics does not subscribe to what is usually called the > "subject-object dichotomy" (especially contexts wherein it renders a > sharp division between mind and body). Sharp or blurred isn't the point rather the MOQ says that reality's deepest division is Dynamic/Static NOT Subjective/Objective. Then it adopts the former SOM as own value, how this adoption is made is the bone of contetion. > If we compare the transition from ZAMM to Lila, we see that ZAMM's > Quality is Lila's DQ. Exactly, ZAMM's Quality is the DQ of the DQ/SQ dualism, not something outside of the MOQ. Had this been realized we would have a new metaphysics not merely another more complicated SOM. > ZAMM, when referring to Quality, conveys the idea of pure immediate > experience, to the extent that you can't even use the terms pure, > immediate and experience, because they tend to pigeonhole Quality to a > fixed idea, no matter how broadly encompassing it may appear to be. > Quality is everything and beyond everything. Sure, the DQ of the MOQ is beyond everything, no problem with that statement or anything else said here. IMO Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
