[Platt] In the view of the MOQ, yes. Don't you think that something of more value is better than something of lesser value? (values=morals)
[Arlo] Its just odd terminology to me. For example, if we say that morals=values, and then refer to a berry as a "biological pattern of morals", then we are left saying this... "a berry is a less moral patterns of morals than a bear, which is a more moral pattern of morals". This is why I don't think "better" is best seen as "more moral" (within levels). "Betterness" is the movement of "patterns of morals" towards Dynamic Quality. Rather than the confusing statement above, I'd say "a bear is a biological pattern of morals that is better able to respond to Dynamic Quality than a berry, which is also a biological pattern of morals". So, for me, its a matter of precision and clarity that's all. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
