Quoting Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Platt] > In the view of the MOQ, yes. Don't you think that something of more > value is better than something of lesser value? (values=morals) > > [Arlo] > Its just odd terminology to me. For example, if we say that > morals=values, and then refer to a berry as a "biological pattern of > morals", then we are left saying this... "a berry is a less moral > patterns of morals than a bear, which is a more moral pattern of > morals". This is why I don't think "better" is best seen as "more > moral" (within levels). "Betterness" is the movement of "patterns of > morals" towards Dynamic Quality. > > Rather than the confusing statement above, I'd say "a bear is a > biological pattern of morals that is better able to respond to > Dynamic Quality than a berry, which is also a biological pattern of morals". > > So, for me, its a matter of precision and clarity that's all.
OK. I'm all for precision and clarity -- and differences of opinion. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
