[Ham]
> According to your analysis, Pirsig systemizes two realities as constituting
> the MoQ: the experiential (S/O) and the pre-conceptual (DQ).
I think it would be better to say: "two ASPECTS OF REALITY as constituting
the MoQ: the CONCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE of S/O (SQ) and the pre-conceptualEXPERIENCE
(DQ)."[Ham]> If [DQ] is not a concept, it could not have been conceived.This is
a use/mention mistake. I can conceive of a 5 legged stool, butthat doesn't
make it a concept rather than a piece of furniture. [Ham]> what makes the
conceptualized system more "fundamental" than the experienced> system?The
pre-conceptual DQ is more fundamental than SQ.Craig
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
