Chris:
> "Robert Pirsig : I have to say, generally speaking
> it is not good to talk
> about 'Zen' because Zen is nothingness and the more
> you talk about it the
> further away you go from it"
> from:
> http://www.robertpirsig.org/Observer%20Interview.htm
SA: Sure. Also he talks about Zen too. It's really
both ways. It's not exclusively what you keep saying,
"Don't talk about Zen or your lying". Pirsig
recommends Zen. Recommends Zen books. States Zen has
ideas. I really don't think we need to keep bringing
up, Pirsig says this, and Pirsig says that, this is
easily understood by our own minds. If you know Zen,
then you can talk about Zen and know what is meant.
If you take this very literally, then you might as
well stop discussing on the forum. All this static
quality is evil according to dq's perspective. Yet,
static quality is good. I don't know what all the
hubbub - bub... is.
Chris:
> I thank you for your well meant intentions, but I
> have no "ordeal with
> thoughts and words." in that way. It's quite clear.
SA: It's not "quite clear". We can talk about Zen
and the moq. Why else are you on this forum? Are you
anti-intellectual? I'm sincerly asking you. It would
be best to know this upfront.
Also, if you commented on what I said and
quoted specifically, instead of generalizing back
without a one to one comment, then it seems your just
writing back preconceptions without actually reading
posts. At least, that's how it seems for the moment.
I'm asking for I'm truly a tiny skull anyways.
tiny skull,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
