Chris:
> So you can see I am not anti-intellectual at all. I
> want the MOQ to work.
> Regarding your quotes, I know them, and I like them.
> But what am I supposed
> to do with them? Think about them when I meditate?
> No, not that. Have them
> in mind when I discuss the MOQ? But I do! In my view
> of the MOQ everything
> is quality. Static and Dynamic.
SA: Ok. I see the main hitch to you not
understanding what I'm saying. You regard the
intellect as s/o only. I regard the intellect as
being able to intellectualize in ways that are not
only s/o. Anything that doesn't fall into your s/o
intellect instantly becomes a social pattern.
Mysticism to you is some kind of 'religion' for you
incline towards logical positivism, my guess. We've
been down this path before, and I many before you came
aboard into this forum. They both are intellectual,
and mysticism is mentioned in Lila as understanding
the dynamic nature of living more than positivism, and
the complaints of positivism of mysticism is it's some
'new age' event. I'm not going to get locked in the
either-or struggle. I notice the third prong in the
intellect - right down the middle. I find this
discussion is near the end for we've come to that
point were we are grounded upon certain ways of
intellectualizing reality and they are diverse.
Diversity is good. Welcome to the well-spring of
democracy.
mu,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
