Anthony, Arlo, Bodvar
Anthony wrote: > On this point (as well many others!) I'd tend to agree with Arlo though > I'm always >interested in what Bodvar has got to say, Chris: What about this: Isn't the different patterns supposed to be in conflict? I mean, each pattern have different ways of "responding" to quality, and as has been stated many many times "regard each other as immoral" how can this definition work if we say that the intellectual level is to look upon symbols as separate entities? The way I see it, that isn't in conflict with anything. I mean, one can clearly see how full fledged rationality may be in conflict with Social Patterns of Value, but "the ability to manipulate symbols"? What is that in conflict with? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
