Hi Ktim see comments DM
>> [Krimel] >> I don't see how consciousness can come before unconsciousness and I would >> never equate DQ or SQ with either. > > DM: Well until you can make this imaginative leap you're gonna be missing > my point. Frankly, why not? > > [Krimel] > First, because it makes more sense to me to speak of the unconscious > evolving toward consciousness, than to talk about consciousness falling > asleep. (Lila game notwithstanding) As to the second part, because > consciousness is neither; it is a combination of both. DM: My point, to use your language, is that inorganic patterns are neither all SQ or DQ but a combination of both, hence there is no great divide with organic patterns, if you say there are aspects to human beings that rocks don't have like language who would disagree but after you list such things have you listed everything we mean by consciousness and does that leave anything in common with rocks? This is an extreme point about what we do and do not know I admit but without this admission we may fail to see how life & consciousness is possible for inorganic patterns as it clearly is when brought into certain patterns that realise new possibilities. > > > [Krimel] > Hamish is a very useful language if your intent is to sound like an expert > without the need to actually say anything meaningful. DM: This is his sin, but he does not always commit it. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
