> Ron:
> Yes sir, what I was trying to stress was how
> languages treat nouns.
SA: Thank you Ron for explaining this to me. That's
what I was looking for when I addressed this to Arlo.
I was beginning to wonder if this thought was dying
out or what.
If a chair, a noun, can be abstract and
concrete, what does this mean? I would say happiness,
though more abstract than concrete, is still concrete
in how we may express happiness or find happiness is
the clear intent or not, for instance, a smile or
frown, concrete traits of happiness, or war, more
anger than happiness. I like your explanations Ron,
and I'm beginning to agree with you for I can't find
reason not to. I'm curious about the question I offer
and the comment. How would you put these into your
line of thinking?
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
