[Krimel] Other symbolic systems from the written word to music to art, carry Varying degrees of ambiguity but more emotional depth. That depth offers clarity at the expense of precision. But this is why I argue that not all thought is linguistic or symbolic.
Ron: I'm not saying all of our language is objective or logical, language does have it's Abstract meaning also. This is what I mean about how we perceive the S/O distinction. It is a matter of our grammar. [Krimel] I do not think that perception has much to do with grammar. Perception is the integration of sensation and memory. Perception is distilled into grammar. It is communicated through grammar. But experience and even thought are not wholly grammatical in my view. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
