> s: If the human brain is a neural net then the neural net > may be able to configure itself to anything?
SA:? Ok, so time is involved.? "may be able to", but not now I guess? s: The point is,?a neural net?may be able to configure everything that has existed, or anything that could exist, and one of these is our culture. However,?a neural net?may configure nothing at all, which in this context is direct access to DQ. You were once simply this. You didn't exist then, but you arrived later. It has always been my belief that we all share a blank slate stage which can be accessed again - and for religious people this is God, for Zennies it is NOW, for moqers it is DQ, depending on your cultural static patterns. To determine this stage 'babies' is emotive, and appeals to a deeply held sense of biological outrage. However, this is a thought experiment, and as such, anything goes. If one wishes to soothe ones biological outrage, one may simply agree to replace biological neural nets with artificial?analogues which exhibit identical properties. This is a thought experiment after all, and we have the luxury of allowing anything we wish our imaginations to consider useful. The experiment demonstrates that by?moq logic and without appeal to tenets other than its own: for the first time in the evolution of?static patterns, these patterns may be arranged such that pre linguistic neural nets maintain maximal unmediated experience of DQ, while intellectual patterns (symbolic manipulation) continue to evolve utilising AI. s: > Neural nets may be the key to pure immediate unmediated > direct experience of DQ? SA:? Static patterns are key, which it seems your saying here. s: From our cultural perspective, a biological?neural net is a configuration of inorganic and organic?static patterns. But the configuration of these patterns seems to be what we intuitively feel we should regard as dynamic static patterns. In previous posts, we explored what the significance of dynamic patterns may be. A neural net may be a good example of dynamic static patterns. It was suggested that maintaining dynamic static patterns was a moral imperative in the moq, because by its own definition, these are best. Note: it has always been?insisted in this experiment that both sq and DQ are maintained. It is simply the configuration?in the context?of a thought experiment which can allow future technological possibilities which is under consideration. > s: 'feral' and 'child' and all symbolic > language either social or intellectual would not be > involved, only immediate experience of DQ. Thus, sq is > mastered i should think. SA:? I don't know.? I don't know what you mean here.? The static patterns are involved in realizing dq it would seem to me. SA s: See above: re. Note. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
