dmb to Squonk:
> Maintaining the pre-linguistic state of infants won't
> produce mystics. That would be a matter of disrupting the
> normal developmental process and it would only produce
> retarded child.
Squonk, you mentioned infants theoretically may not need parents anymore.
Did you miss the point I was making about infants that are not touched?
Contact, touch, interconnectedness, these are intertwined snugly. I see
this vat getting in the way, towards a 'retardation', maybe of infants if your
"theoretical" experiment would take hold.
I'll post a reply to your direct post to me, Squonk, this happened to jump
out at me while I was catching up on this thread.
finally made it camping after the third try this year,
no concussion this time,
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/