s:
> Well this experiment is blooming and i would wish to keep
> things centred on the moral dimension if you are agreeable
> SA?
> Here we go...
SA: ok, let's ride.
> SA previously:? What is difficult, and thus the
> "disagreement" on my part, is this sci-fi
> rendition, which would make an excellent anime, yet, if you
> truly want to take
> the next step and do this industrial scale brain in vats,
> it would seem too
> early, a hasting of evolution.? Do we need brains in vats
> this very moment?? If
> we continue with the thought-experiment pattern, and put
> aside on actually
> making these brains in vats, then it is the thought, the
> pattern that your
> trying to communicate that I would be interested in.
> s: Well, i think what TE1 is looking at is the
> superannuating of homo sapiens: Intellectual patterns would
> continue to evolve in quantum computers (because they will
> be able to do it more dynamically) but the human social
> level would be sacrificed for pure immediate experience of
> DQ.
SA: Are you saying no more walking in the woods? I looked up "TE1" and I
found "Terminal Equipment 1". What's this? I know you define some of it
above, but could you expand on this. Interesting...
> s: All i've ever done is talk in terms of DQ/sq.
> Metaphors and stuff were brought in by others.
SA: ok.
> SA previously:? Difference between babies and Zen masters, Zen
> masters, for one, can talk
> about their experience.? This talk is Zen too.? Static
> patterns are Zen.?
> Dynamic quality is Zen.? Zen doesn't see a difference,
> and Zen recognizes a
> difference.? I like 'sq is dq' 'dq is sq'
>
> s: Then better sq is better DQ better DQ is better sq.
> But DQ can't be better because it simply is.
> Therefore, this is not symetrical. See?
SA: Yes. sq is dq is not symetrical. Sq is dq and dq is sq, but if you will,
dq is 'heavier', has more to it, than sq. The "is" translates that sq comes
from and is dynamic quality, but in its' (sq's) own unique static pattern way.
To bring up what you mentioned earlier, which helps, sq is dq but sq is so in a
limited way; static filters and pigeon-holing.
woods,
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
