SA:
With your abstract/concrete explanation, a hitch would be this
abstract part. I've been contemplating how all of this is imagination.
All imaginary. Yet, with the stipulation that these happenings be
unmasked from those in history that have tried to demonize them.
Ron:
Not quite sure what you mean SA, the abstract/concrete distinction is
lingual. Descriptors for experience. Now, Aristotle by defining truth
statements maintains that these are two differing experiences while
Pirsig says not really, they are all the same but we use different terms
to describe them.
When we use DQ/SQ as terms to describe experience rather than as
entities
that interact, a lot of the confusion dissolves.
then we may talk about dynamic quality in experience, but talking about
dynamic quality as if it is a concrete entity is where the trouble
begins
and where I believe why Pirsig states that DQ is indefinable.
It is this little grammatical tidbit that caused Bo to develop
SOL to allow us to talk about DQ. But as I said, all it did is lead us
into confusion and right back to square one .
warm, breezy, the smell of hay in the fields
and blooming day lilies
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
