> s previously:
> > I took this to mean: What good is DQ for YOU if it
> > can't be comprehended.
> SA previously: By a comprehending human, yes, what good is dq if it
> is thought to be
> non-comprehendable to a comprehendable human? So, I think
> dq is ever-comprehended.
s:
> I think this would be akin to an atemporal experience of
> ecstasy and beatitude.
SA: awe... yes...
sleep,
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
