> [Krimel] > Exactly which is why I think pooh-poohing neurophysiology as being > metaphysically irrelevant is a crock. I am afraid I would have to classify
> a > human being, any human being as a biological pattern of value. Social > patterns of value would exist in the interaction of two or more > individuals > and intellectual patterns I think are best represented on the internet. > DM: Odd that you think bottom up classification is more useful than top down, especially given what you say below. Are you confused? [Krimel] I think not. Why, do you thinks I should be? > [Krimel] > I think in any hierarchical system the upper levels depend on continue > stasis at the lower levels. Each level emerges from the levels below it > and is largely constrain by the patterns below it. Upper level patterns > can not specifically be determined by the levels below them but their > general outlines and the limits or range of possibilities is definitely > determined by the lower level patterns. > > For example the biological need to eat demands that competition for food > resources will be socially mediated. The lack of wings means that there > will be little competition for air space. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
