Hi Ron
Ron:
Magnus, I have read your essay and I have to say your description
of the 3-d model of the levels does not need to be limited to
orthography
(perpendicular right angles). Simple x,y,z coordinate system will define
almost any 3-d structure accurately,
Accurately, yes, but in a non-orthogonal 3D system, it will be possible to
define a 3D structure in more than one way. And that is what's causing lots of
disagreement here.
But I am still unsure of the type
of model you are proposing, are you proposing a mathematical model
of running integers or a simple matrix in which to chart and describe.
A fair question. I'm not suggesting to order all possible patterns of level X
along the X-axis, all Y patterns along the Y axis and so on. There's nothing
mathematical about it, no integers are involved. The orthogonal dimensional
metaphor can not be interpreted to the letter.
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
