What I adhere to aggressively is fuckin responsibility whether it a collection of overlapping patterns or whatever we're callin it today. fall back to corporal identity once again. is'nt this evasion?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arlo Bensinger Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 2:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MD] Many Avatars, Many Selves [Ron] What I said before about the source being every bit as vital as the words in the development of meaning in value relationships still stands for me. [Arlo] What do you mean by "source"? Do you mean attributes of the body? Does it include these at all? Do you mean attributes of a "real self"? Who determines this? How do you determine these? Take some examples, start with Mark/Julia. What is the "source" you refer to in Julia's identity? Is it her male body? What if this body underwent surgery? Would Julia's "source" change? Its clear to me, Ron, that you adhere very aggressively to the "one body, one mind, one soul" illusion, going so far now as to advance a singular, real "source" from which all identities derive, indeed a "source" that allows us to determine whether any given identity is "real" or "pretend". So spell out for me what you think this "source" is. Are we born with it? Can it change? How do we change it? Can we change it by whim? Can we change it by surgery? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
