[Ron]
now we're getting somewhere.

[Arlo]
I was already "somewhere", Ron. I find the considerations of identity fascinating and highly valuable. If I meet you in your "place" of responsibility, I hope you consider joining me over in my "place" of identity.

[Ron]
Seeing how the human condition is defined by social level patterns, I'd say you confuse the term illusion with hallucination. An illusion is a distortion, it exists but not as perceived. Consequently "self" exists but not in the way our society perceives it as a singularity of mind/body. No?

[Arlo]
Well, hmm. Let's make sure when we say "the self exists" we aren't using S/O understandings of "existence". The "self" is a value pattern according to the MOQ, and its perceived "existence" has everything to do with its value. Indeed, this is why I say that the "Arlo" that exists in this social world called "MOQ Discuss" is every bit as real (and every bit as unreal) as the "Aenea" that exists in the social world called "Warcraft". The existence of BOTH is tied to their active, social value.

I use the word illusion along the lines of a Gestalt "image" or hologram. The term "hallucination" contains too much pejorative meaning for me to like it in this context.

[Ron]
Yes, what is left sans social convention? is the biological pattern Arlo, Nope. What else is there other than the "illusion" of social convention?

[Arlo]
Well this has been my point all along. So what's the beef?

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to