[Arlo]

When Ant held the MOQ Conference, one of the list's former contributors
took it
upon himself to "rehash" this by doing the same thing to Ant. He
submitted and
delivered a paper he wrote to demonstrate what he felt were the
absurdities and
cultishness of the MOQ. He then used comments by Pirsig about this paper
to
"prove" how absurd the MOQ is.

If you read the archives, you'll see that while some here supported
this, or
though we should learn from it, I was one of the vocal crowd who felt
this act
of maliciousness deserved no credit for anything, and fully supported
the
continued ban on this person from contributing here (he has gotten back
in at times under various pseudonyms). 

Ron:
Well, who or what do you feel should be banned and why? You maintain 
we should value the words not the identity. If they have no value
whats the harm?


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to