Bo,
From page 196-197 in Lila's Child, a question by Mark and RMP's annotation.
-------------
[Mark]:
Sorry to appear tangential to your original thread, but you are
using the terms "subject" and "object" in an unusual way for me.
Could you please help me understand? Do you agree that "subject"
implies the self and "objects" are all that is not self? [73]
[RMP]
73. In the MOQ, the static self is composed of both body and
mind and thus is both subject and object. It is better to
define subject as social and intellectual patterns and object
as biological and inorganic patterns. This seems to help
prevent confusion later on.
-------------
As you can read above, RMP uses the subject/object analogy. So
please hold back insinuating that to use such terminology
automatically makes me incorrect, and my ideas easily dismissed.
Marsha
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
