At 05:44 AM 10/19/2008, you wrote:
Marsha writes:
I suppose if you have read this far, I need to thank you for your attention.
I hope the others are better able to offer you comments.
Andre,
Dear Marsha! Do not underestimate your contributions. I learn from them.
What is the difference between "phenomena" as referent and "concepts" as
referent? Is it the same as 'keeping your feet on the ground and "building
castles in the air"?
Hello Andre,
There are no things-in-themselves.
Phenomena as a referent would be something external like granite as
an inorganic static pattern of value (spov). A concept as a referent
would be an idea like Socialism as a social static pattern of value
(spov). What I am trying to get at is that in both cases, granite
(inorganic level) and Socialism (social level), regardless of the
referent, the static pattern of value is conceptual.
What do you think?
Marsha
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
