[Arioch] > Aye, therefore it is moral to attack China on these grounds > per Pirsig with ruthlessnes!! > > o we do enjoy thy interpretation o Pirsig > > eh o' one of thy lower speech o Gaul! > > justification of murder on intellectual grounds! tis moral! say you > > forsoothe, perchance read thy Pirsig Quote more closely.
It is moral for intellectual Chinese to attack their collectivist masters, as they did in 1989. > "And this is a war in which intellect, to end the paralysis of society has > to know whose side it is on, and support that side and never undercut it. > Where biological values are undermining social values intellectuals must > identify social behavior, not matter its ethnic connection, and support it > all the way without restraint. Intellectuals must find biological > behavior, > no matter what its ethnic connection, and limit or destroy destructive > biological patterns with complete moral ruthlessness., the way a doctor > destroys germs, before those biological patterns destroy civilization > itself." (Lila,24) [Platt] > As above, intellect has to constantly battle the push for control by the > forces of collectivist Soc. PoV's that you have so eloquently described in > China. [Arioch] > time for new glasses one of the lo-speech of germainia... intellect musts > sides with soc. > again bio. wherein doth thy see intellect vs soc? "It says that what is meant by "human rights" is usually the moral code of intellect-vs. -society, the moral right of intellect to be free of social control. Freedom of speech; freedom of assembly, of travel; trial by jury; habeas corpus; government by consent-these "human rights" are all intellect- vs.-society issues." (Lila, 24) You'll see better if you open the book. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
