Thank you Krimel.
My meaning is that a thing does not inherently exist. A thing exist
based on convention.
Marsha
At 08:06 PM 1/18/2009, you wrote:
>[Krimel]
>This is a big stumbling block. Marsha for example keeps repeating the manta
>that it is all just conceptual patterns devoid of "reality;" just the
>shifting of points of view; illusion, maya. It is not just that the TiTs
>are unknowable in their fullness but that they have no "existence" in any
> sense of the term "existence."
- Marsha
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Marsha says that patterns are devoid of
inherent existence.
And what they refer to lacks inherent existence.
[Krimel]
I stand corrected:
This is a big stumbling block. Marsha for example keeps repeating the manta
that it is all just conceptual patterns devoid of inherent existence, just
the shifting of points of view; illusion, maya. It is not just that the TiTs
are unknowable in their fullness but that they have no "inherent existence"
in any sense."
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
