At 10:00 AM 1/19/2009, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
>My meaning is that a thing does not inherently exist.  A thing exist
>based on convention.
>
>[Krimel]
>So what does "exist" or have inherent existence?

[Marsha]
No thing inherently exists.  No thing exists from its own
side.  There is no thing-in-itself.  No thing has its own essence or
nature, etc.

Entities exist by convention and are best represented as patterns,
ever-changing, interrelated, mutually dependent static patterns of value,

[Krimel]
So for you, unless the cheese stands alone its existence is insignificant?

No, spovs are not insignificant, but they are also not TiTs.


Marsha




.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to