> [Marsha] > is there "any kind of > similarity between Krimel's 'probability' and the Buddhist 'mutually > interdependent based on cause and conditions' and RMP replacing > 'cause' with 'prefers'.
[Craig] One more try. Striking a match In an oxygen-rich room will cause an explosion. But the striking of the match plays the same part as the oxygen-rich room. Craig [Krimel] Just a word of props here, Craig. I thought your first example was excellent. The event: rolling snake eyes is a product of the independently arising probabilities of rolling one and rolling one. Above, "fire" results from the independently arising conditions of "presence of oxygen" and "striking of match." These conditions themselves are the product of independently arising probabilities of oxygen being found in the atmosphere and the collection of probabilities that lead to the invention of "matches" and the evolution of creatures who can strike them. It is all a nest or "field" of probabilities. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
