>[Marsha] >My meaning is that a thing does not inherently exist. A thing exist >based on convention. > >[Krimel] >So what does "exist" or have inherent existence?
[Marsha] No thing inherently exists. No thing exists from its own side. There is no thing-in-itself. No thing has its own essence or nature, etc. Entities exist by convention and are best represented as patterns, ever-changing, interrelated, mutually dependent static patterns of value, [Krimel] So for you, unless the cheese stands alone its existence is insignificant? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
