[Marsha} > Rather than a causes b, a one-directional thing, a Buddhist might > state that the relationship between a and b is mutually > interdependent based on cause and conditions. > Does probability always imply a one-direction relationship, or is the > implied relationship mutually interdependent?
Suppose the odds of rolling a 1 on a die are 1/6. And the odds of rolling a 1 on another die are 1/6. The odds of picking up the dice, shaking them and rolling two 1s are 1/36 (= 1/6 x 1/6). Thats because the two rolls are statistically independent events, even though they are not physically independent. A Buddhist casino calculates odds the same way as Las Vegas. Craig
Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
