Andre, My comment was just observation. I believe that the recognition of entropy IS the clear indication of evolution in the universe. Dead matter, like biomatter, responds to entropy with structure. It betrays in that conditioned existence (by energy) the sensitivity to change and the vector that defines evolution.
There is no 'IF' . The MoQ, or whatever it is an echo of, has no worry about order-- or evolution... We have no disagreement. My intent is to state your case more forcefully. thanks--mel p.s. I will think on the first part and respond later. <Snip> > Mel: > > Second, > I found it interesting that the question came up of whether there > truly is cosmological evolution and no one pointed out that the > evidence for such (or its recognition from another point of view) > is referred to as entropy. > > Andre: > Not sure if this is a question or an observation needing no response but > I'll do so anyway: IMHO the MoQ requires the universe to be 'ordered' indeed > this is where it gets its evolutionary dimension from. 'The ordering of the > four static levels would cease to be a viable basis for a moral framework if > cosmological evolution does not exist. The only basis for morality then > would be tradition and Dynamic Quality- pretty much what we have today'. > Unless I misunderstood your observation Mel. > > Kind regards, > Andre > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
