Hi DMB
30 Jan. you wrote:
> Bo, I can see that you think there is some kind of problem but I can't
> make any sense of it. What, exactly, is the problem?
I wrote a longish piece, but have deleted it all, because I know you
will wander off on some tangent. So try to concentrate. If James
and Dewey and Northrop agree on an undifferentiated, primary
something ahead of our subject/object reality, and Pirsig joins
them, only adding that this is called "Quality", then the (first ZAMM)
MOQ should have looked like this:
Undifferentiated or DQ - slash - Differentiated or SQ
not the:
Quality
|
Undifferentiated or DQ - slash - Differentiated or SQ
... which is behind the Quality/MOQ "metaphysics" that overrides
the MOQ
IMO
Bo
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
