Krimel said to dmb:
Cartesian assumptions? ...Saying that you are rejecting solipsism by rejecting 
Descartes is just rearranging the bumper stickers on your car. ...By the way 
Descartes "cogito" is not at all to be equated with Cartesian dualism.


dmb replies:
Descartes' famous saying (I think therefore I am) is the classic case of 
solipsism. It comes from his famous Meditations, where he concludes that his 
own existence is the only thing he could know for sure and God is the only 
thing that rescues him from this solipsism. His "cogito" would be just one half 
of mind/matter dualism. Pirsig corrects that famous saying, pointing out that 
it would be more correct to say, "French language exists, therefore I think, 
therefore I am". That's just one passage where we find the assertion that ideas 
are culturally derived but that one goes right to the point.

Radical Empiricism, by the way, is a direct attack on this dualism. As I've 
said here many, many times you'll find Pirsig talking about this a quoting 
James on exactly this point at the end of Lila's chapter 29. "Subjects and 
objects are secondary. They are concepts derived from something more 
fundamental which he described as 'the immediate flux of life which furnishes 
the material to our later reflection with its conceptual categories.' In this 
basic flux of experience, the distinctions of reflective thought, such as those 
between consciousness and content, subject and object, mind and matter have not 
yet emerged in the forms which we make them. Pure experience cannot be called 
either physical or psychical; it logically precedes this distinction." 
Obviously, this involves far more than bumper stickers.
I would also point out, as I have many times, that this Cartesian dualism (SOM) 
is the problem which the MOQ is meant to overcome. It's simply a logical 
necessity that a person needs to understand the problem before the solution to 
it can be properly understood. And maybe you just think I'm just trying to 
score points while playing a game with you. Or maybe you take it as mere insult 
but, dude, it really is quite pointless to discuss these things with you until 
you understand the problem. And when you do things like confuse the MOQ with 
solipsism it becomes pretty clear that you don't understand the problem. 
I honestly don't think it would do any good to repeat these things to you any 
further so you're on your own now. Good luck. I mean that sincerely.







_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Hotmail®…more than just e-mail. 
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_hm_justgotbetter_howitworks_012009
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to