BoBo sez:
OK, If you see Quality=Dynamic Quality and this spawning the 
static levels all is fine with me, but then no more about any Quality 
"out there" and a theoretical or verbal DQ/SQ "in our minds". If the 
MOQ is to be a break with SOM the first break must be with this 
arch-SOM-ish notion.  

Again enough, the rest of your post was just more of the same.

Ron:
How SOM-ish is the notion of DQ/SQ being reality itself?
almost like objective reality being reality itself. huh.

IF you must spoon feed Dave, allow me to I.V. drip this:

What you fail to realize is that we are reality. Any conceptualization
will never be the whole account of experience only a particular view of it.
this "fact" Pirsig names Quality. 




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to