Hi Marsha 

Bo before:
> > "Intellect is the value of the "real/representative" distinction.

Marsha:
> I do not understand this sentence.  I see all 
> patterns having the same nature, but pointing to 
> referents of varying evolutionary standing, and 
> because of that, falling into the different

There are different levels for the reason that patterns are NOT of the same 
nature. 
Inorganic patterns are incompatible with biological patterns and so on upwards. 
 
 
> levels.  The pattern E = mc2 and its mathematical 
> meaning would fall into the Intellectual level.  Yes?  No?

Yes, it is because it is supposed to be an objective"law" of nature, not merely 
a figment of 
Einstein's mind (ref. Newton's Gravity) SOM again..     

> Thoughts?  Bo?  Anybody?

I'll bring up my: "Intellect is the value of the "real/representative" 
distinction" sentence again 
and try a most "grotesque" application of it.

SOList or not we all agree that the social level did not have the 
subject/object distinction (of 
which "representative versus real" is a form) now we also agree that formal 
religions are 
social patterns ...no? 

For me the most pure formal religion is Islam (Christendom is heavily 
intellect-influenced) 
and a muslim fundamentalist will blow himself to smithereens  because killing 
islam's 
enemies will grant him an eternal life in paradise. 

The point is that afterlife, paradise and such aren't spiritual to social level 
dwellers, but very 
corporeal and sensual. This is what intellect has driven its S/O wedge into and 
if not totally 
made religions into dubious subjective state of MIND (as the scientific 
skeptical branch has 
it)  then at least made the afterlife ..etc. into a soul-ish, spiritual 
experience (as the intellect-
influenced Christendom has it).   

Do you now understand why I call the subject/object split (or mind/matter)  
intellect's VALUE 
and why I alternate between praising and accusing  it? It has disarmed 
religious fanaticism 
yet when it comes to you (folks) your total immersion in intellect makes you 
incapable of 
understanding the MOQ. ...if not this is a turning point? Must add that this is 
just one single 
aspect of intellect's "control" of social value.


Bo







.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to