Hi Joe 
I invited  Michael Poloukhine to the "skepticism" debate but he 
suddenly clammed shut.  

20 Feb you wrote:

(on the issue why the alleged Muslim science - that flourished 
while Europe was in its Medieval hibernation - didn't develop the 
kind of scientific skepticism that so dominate the West? I,e, 
distance itself from religion.

> In my study of medieval philosophy I recall Arabian authors Avicenna,
> and Averrhoes in the 12th century discussing Aristotle before Thomas
> Aquinas.  I believe Aquinas quotes them.  Also Moses Maimonides was
> mentioned.  I guess Arabian and Jewish philosophy was SOM. 

Most interesting Joe. However if philosophy (necessarily) is SOM 
is a big question. One way seen philosophy means truth-seeking in 
the Greek sense that in Greece resulted in a break with the 
mythological god-centered past. But as the Dark Ages descended 
philosophy deteriorated into studying the God-given reality, no 
skepticism about those premises..

> Evolution is later and I have no idea how Arabian and Jewish thought
> incorporates evolution into their culture. 

Do you mean biological - Darwinian - evolution, if so it definitely 
was much later, and it would be too much to expect THAT to 
emerge, my hunch however is that.Greek SOM began to influence 
Christendom and pry it away from its social - Semitic - roots, 
developing its intellectual branch. Humankind got an eternal soul 
different from its perishable body (a S/O pattern) And the rest is 
history.

> As for a theory of how we know things, abstraction etc., I imagine
> William James, Pirsig and others are fairly recent, and have not been
> absorbed into Jewish or Arabian culture. 

James and Pirsig never becoming part of Jew and Muslim "canon" 
is for sure ;-)  and my guess is that Judaism and Islam never will - 
cannot - develop a similar "intellectual" branch, that window of 
opportunity is closed.
 
> As far as being incomprehensible. I am sure my writing is disjointed
> as I try to express how I feel things.  Emotions and senses though
> indefinable are as much a part of knowledge as Intellectual
> expression. It is easy to make knowledge mechanical.  I try to fight
> that and add emotional and sensational elements.  I am sorry if it is
> obscure.

Disregard my sarcasms, keep thinking and posting

Bo



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to