On Tuesday 17 February 2009 1:46 AM Bo writes to Kieffer O: <snip> Well, let me not stray, the issue was the intellect vs society struggle showing itself in the Western culture's unique faith/skepticism dichotomy, that to my knowledge is unknown to all other cultures I don't know about any upheaval caused by Darwin's theory in Judaism and Islam that I believe has the same Genesis in their holy books. Bo
Hi Bo and Kieffer, An interesting discussion. IMO There is no clear theory of how we know things. MOQ is evolution. DQ/SQ is conceptualization. Yet DQ participates in evolution. DQ is an undefined term used in two different ways. Considering evolution, there are only so many possibilities. Why? Our knowledge is limited. Why? One answer is that if the past is any guide the future is unknown e. g., MOQ transplanting SOM. S/O is a part of knowledge. Is there a further evolution of S, creating a seemingly twisted perception of O. I say yes. S evolves to two further levels than the combination of S/O. Nonsense! This is possible only if evolution itself upholds S. Pretty vague! Undefined! Yet this seems to be the only reasonable explanation for visionaries like Jules Verne, H. G. Wells, Christ, Mohammed, etc.. Joe On 2/16/09 1:46 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, let me not stray, the issue was the intellect vs society > struggle showing itself in the Western culture's unique > faith/skepticism dichotomy, that to my knowledge is unknown to all > other cultures I don't know about any upheaval caused by Darwin's > theory in Judaism and Islam that I believe has the same Genesis > in their holy books. > > Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
