> MP: But this only further disproves your own point: *Reflex* takes > you off the stove. > > To affirm that this reflex is based on Quality as opposed to > simple biological self > preservation takes faith because you can't *prove* its Quality > rather than > biological self preservational reflex. The latter is the only thing > you can actually > prove, the former is un-provable. You have evidence "for" the latter > but only evidence "of" the former. > > [Krimel] > Quality and "simple biological self preservation" are one and the > same thing.
MP: then why bother calling it Quality? MP ---- "Don't believe everything you think." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
