> > [Krimel] > > Quality and "simple biological self preservation" are one and the > > same thing. > > MP: then why bother calling it Quality? > > [Krimel] > See my post to Marsha for an elaboration but in short: Quality is a what > Case calls the sense of senses. It allows the combination of discrete > sensory input into a unity. The mammals all have this. In humans it is > further developed and includes much more than issues of life and death. We > actually enjoy having our emotional responses manipulated. Music does this. > So does storytelling. Modern forms of the narrative arts are nothing short > of guided meditations during which we lose all sense of self and allow our > emotions and experience to be manipulated by the actors and director. So > Quality in this way has a much greater significance that "simple biological > self preservation".
MP: Nice idea. I'm saying "Prove it." If you can't prove it, then how do you come to affirm such an idea to be fact not fiction? I'm saying the *only* way (if Quality is to be as RMP has it) is through faith; affirmation absent proof. And (back to how this started) in Arlo's world, that might as well be talking about Leprechauns. MP ---- "Don't believe everything you think." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
