Marsha: First I was stunned at your use of "I think" to explain your scientific point-of-view, next shocked, now amused at how wise Lila was in Chapter 14. For you and Science it is 'I think' all the way down, analogues, conceptual constructs (or turtles). What is any interpretation given to percepts except repetition of 'I thinks'?
"...I'm whatever your questions turn me into. You don't see that. It's your questions that make me who I am. If you think I'm an angel then that's what I am. If you think I'm a whore then that's what I am. I'm whatever you think. And if you change your mind about me then I change too. So whatever Richard tells you, it's true. There's no way he can lie about me." Well, maybe, shatter they do. ??? [Krimel] This, and your ongoing mantra about killing ALL conceptual patterns are simply absurd. You rendering all communication as meaningless as bird song. You would reduce us all to grunting our emotions without reflection. Nature has bestowed upon us the gift of finding meaning. She gives us the tools to share that meaning with each other. You would throw it back in her face, content with a head full of immediate sense impressions, heedless of the past and unconcerned about the future. It's like you are claiming that the ultimate state of being would be a persistent vegetative state. That seems to be YOUR conception of the world, all that way down. It seems to me if ever a concept deserved a bullet to the head, your concept would be the one. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
