[Steve]
That is how I saw your exchange with MP as well, but he sounds very 
frustrated, so maybe we misunderstood something.

[Arlo]
If it was JUST ME, he'd have a point. But it's not. It's been "all of 
us". And while I admit upfront to having little patience for this 
type of stuff, everyone else has evidenced a great deal of patience 
and genuine interest in explaining the MOQ to him. And yet all of 
them, Ron, you, Marsha, Krimel, DMB, in every thread, have just been 
accused of "not getting it", of being "static".

[Krimel]
Ok, that's it, Arlo. I vigorously disagree. I have no patience for the kind
of brain dead drivel MP has spewed on this subject. It is this kind of
warped view of the court and its function that will be the lasting legacy of
the Raygun debacle. It will take years to rid this nation of Scalia,
Roberts, Thomas and the other justices appointed in a blatant attempt to
rewrite history and justice in this country. We are all, red states and blue
states, victim of this crass manipulation and the fact that people like MP
actually believe this trash is horrifying. So, no! I have not been patient
or even civil in this matter. It deserves neither and shame on any of you
who offer it.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to