Anrde,Krimel, I think we all get different ideas when we concieve of "undefined" for the mind is designed to define and distinguish. This also lends to it's indefinability, but, since the mind is prone to distinction what we experience may be defined in certain terms. These handels are all we have, so sorting out and agreeing to their meaning is a priority one would think.
Ron ________________________________ From: Krimel <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2009 8:03:09 AM Subject: Re: [MD] Chance v. Dynamic Quality [Krimel] OK but I don't think DQ is undefined. Quality is undefined. I think Pirsig conflated the two out of enthusiasm and others follow out of blind obedience. Andre: Hi Krimel, how can you say that DQ is not undefined? Where do you get the idea from that there is a difference between DQ and Quality? My understanding is that DQ and Quality are synonymous. I do think that DQ is an unfortunate term because it suggests something about Quality. Quality should remain undefined and free of/from any association with anything. ZMM's Quality is Lila's DQ/SQ, no? [Krimel] The short answer would be, no. ZMM is about Tao and Lila is about Yin and Yang. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
